The little we know about the mobility path of the Orb?n family is of course hardly exceptional: The state socialist system's cracks, inefficiencies and various other contradictions notwithstanding, a fairly large proportion of today's educated strata exist in a one, maximum two-generation removal from a working-class position. This is all not only fine; arguably, the legacy of this massive collective mobility is among the greatest contributions of state socialist history to social reality in Hungary (as well as in most other erstwhile state-socialist societies).
What is amazing, then, is that Orb?n was able to crack the following joke in a meeting with party activists in the town of Eger last week, in response to a request for an explanation for the rationale behind decreasing the number of tuition-free slots for admissions to law school at state universities from 800 to 100:
"Indeed, it was a mistake to decrease the number of seats in law schools to 100. They should have been cut to zero."
I find this argument, coming from somebody who is the product of a free educational system, from which he benefited because of his constitutionally guaranteed right as a citizen of Hungary, first and foremost unbelievably distasteful. Be that as it may, if this is how Dr. Orb?n (in Hungary, law school degrees are doctorates) feels, I'm sure the state Treasury will accept a lump sum repayment of the real costs of his education, from first year elementary to law school, with appropriate interest, of course. And for his spouse, and five children.
Second, this hardly appears to be--as his liberal critics tend to put it--a "conservative" man. Nor is he a "populist moderate right wing" politician, as he described himself in an interview with a French newspaper recently. Nor is this a particularly Christian or, for that matter, democratic, idea.
IMHO this remark reveals a rather crude, neolib hack, with a really strong streak of repression, who sells himself to large segments of the public yearning for simple and obvious, small bits of what Colbert calls "truthiness," with a lot of nationalist posturing.
In short, I do very much agree with the diagnosis social psychologist J?nos Rudas: probably the most striking feature of all this gibberish is its inconsistency.
There you have it: the habits of the heart of a self-loathing, repressed post-socialist subject. Not a pretty sight.
Source: http://globalsocialchange.blogspot.com/2012/02/what-repressed-joke-reveals.html
st louis weather jack the cat frank lucas lego man lego man cheryl hines john lackey
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.